palin palin
A website about palin
Content Types
palin Videos Videos
palin Photos Photos
palin Blog Posts Blog Posts
palin News News
palin Websites Websites
palin Auctions Auctions
palin Events Events
palin Quotes Quotes
palin Podcasts Podcasts


Rachel Maddow, ''New'' Face of the GOP is looking stagnant (Steele, Palin, and Jindal)

More palin Videos

http://tinyurl.com/dzysbl Piece Taken from http://www.hicktownpress.com/ "The Republicans have decided that white men are out of style. Therefore, they chose two men of color as their spokesmen: 1. Michael Steele, who is so out of touch that he thinks that feeding hip hop to the masses will help the Republican image. b. Bobby Jindal, who is laughable at best. The white Republicans chose the brown Jindal as their puppet and he stood there and delivered. But my question to Jindal is, WHERE WERE YOU when a man with a low I.Q. named George W. Bush was in office pushing war after war and driving our economy into the toilet? Jindal said: The way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians,. [The plan will] grow the government, increase our taxes down the line, and saddle future generations with debt. Its irresponsible,. Oh, really? And all those trillions spent on Bushs wars did not fall into the category of irresponsible? GET REAL!"


Comments about this Video
That doesn't mean she didn't face discrimination in her life. And you, like other racist conservatives, fail to understand what affirmative action is all about. Just proves Sotomayor's point - you really can't get it into you brain that without affirmative action, no Hispanic at that time would have even been considered for an ivy league school, and not because of their abilities, but because of a built in discrimination against them.
Posted Aug 10 2009 4:08AM by HeyNonyNonymous
They sample more Republicans than there are in the population.
Posted Aug 10 2009 4:08AM by HeyNonyNonymous
Well? It wasn't exactly a close call, was it? He won hands down.
Posted Aug 10 2009 4:09AM by HeyNonyNonymous
My point is that he didn't win by double digits. In other words, those polls were full of crap.
Posted Aug 10 2009 5:26PM by Edgehead10075
They sample the percentages of Democrats and Republicans who VOTE, not who are simply registered. Rasmussen still polls more Democrats though. Obama's numbers have gone down because he's losing independents.
Posted Aug 10 2009 5:29PM by Edgehead10075
Maybe some kids called her the "s" word in school, but she didn't encounter institutionalized prejudice. From what I've heard, her SAT score wasn't high enough. How was that due to racism? I'd also like to point out that if a Republican president nominated a Hispanic to the bench and all the Democrats voted "no," they wouldn't be called "racist" by the media.
Posted Aug 10 2009 5:32PM by Edgehead10075
How do you know she didn't encounter institutionalized prejudice? Were you there for every job interview, every school application she ever had? Her SAT score wasn't high enough because she didn't have access as a low class Hispanic to same education that middle class white people had. Her scores IN Prinston were more than high enough, so obviously she was good enough for it and proved it when she got the chance.
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:46PM by HeyNonyNonymous
Democrats would have never voiced objection based on race, which is why they wouldn't have been called racist.
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:47PM by HeyNonyNonymous
Nobody objected to Sotomayor based on race. Nobody said, "She's a Hispanic, and we can't have a Hispanic on the Supreme Court."
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:48PM by Edgehead10075
But Obama's approval ratings have nothing to do with elections polls, and there is no need to sample likely voters in a poll designed to answer the simple question: are American citizens pleased with their president? I believe Obama is losing more of the left than the center. They are disappointed of the lack of progress on gay rights, the wars and healthcare, and they tend to be far less patient than independents.
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:51PM by HeyNonyNonymous
Yeah, but an approval rating is more relevant to the next election cycle if it polls likely voters. When you get down to it, if you don't vote, your opinion doesn't count.
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:53PM by Edgehead10075
Of course not. That would be political suicide. They can't say "I don't want Hispanics at the Supreme Court" and get away with it. But you can stock racial fears with in your constituency, and make a nice political profit. It's impossible to be an out racist in today's politics (though it is still perfectly fine to be an out homophobe), but there are codes to get your message through, and "overt racism" is one of them.
Posted Aug 10 2009 6:57PM by HeyNonyNonymous
There is no affirmative action today. And low income doesn't require affirmative action, it requires money. Besides - the low class in America is disproportionally made of minorities.
Posted Aug 10 2009 7:03PM by HeyNonyNonymous
The next presidential elections is 3.5 years away. Any approval rating is irrelevant now for Obama's chance of getting reelected. And while different polls may show different results - they usually show the same trends. Obama's approval ratings picked up again after a short slump. PS - who's to say now what the likely voter would look like 3.5 years from now? More unlikely voters voted in the last elections than ever, so maybe "likely voter" is a term that needs to be reevaluate.
Posted Aug 10 2009 7:07PM by HeyNonyNonymous
Okay, the big election is 3.5 years away, but the midterm elections are less than 15 months away. 2010 will likely be a referendum on Obama.
Posted Aug 13 2009 2:01AM by Edgehead10075
Can you name me one Republican in the Senate who you think opposes Sotomayor simply because she's Hispanic and not because of her liberal leanings? If Sotomayor were a conservative, every Republican would have been happy to confirm her. Her race wouldn't have meant anything.
Posted Aug 13 2009 2:02AM by Edgehead10075
That may be true, but it seems unfair to me, even if it's just an anecdotal example, for a poor white kid who attends public schools to get screwed over in favor of a wealthy minority who attends private schools.
Posted Aug 13 2009 2:05AM by Edgehead10075
There is no affirmative action today, so that's not going to happen. And your chances of finding a "wealthy minority" member when there used to be AA, was close to nothing.
Posted Aug 13 2009 4:12AM by HeyNonyNonymous
And yet they based their objection on racial issues. Sotomayor is far from the raving liberal they are painting her to be. In her rulings with conservative colleagues, she agrees with them 90% of the time.
Posted Aug 13 2009 4:15AM by HeyNonyNonymous
No, it is likely to be a referndum on the congressional candidates. How are Republicans doing? Not so great.
Posted Aug 13 2009 4:18AM by HeyNonyNonymous
Well, the GOP actually has the momentum in the polls right now, although anything can happen come November 2010.
Posted Aug 13 2009 11:57PM by Edgehead10075
Well, they had to go up. There was no other direction for them to go...
Posted Aug 14 2009 4:18AM by HeyNonyNonymous
Hey, So if you don't think Obama approval rating is dropping, pull your head out of his ass and look at the un-biased current RCP poll data. You man is dropping. The Obama party is over, the music has stopped playing but your still dancing for now. Here's some advice, go buy a box of Extenz, I don't need it but it may give you better luck with the ladies and and the mens. Question, When Obama finishes a speach, do you lay back and light up a cigerette?
Posted Aug 14 2009 4:26AM by HARDSTIFFJAB
Nah! The way to lead is to put more money and power into the hands of those who already have too much! The ones who put us here in the first place!
Posted Sep 5 2009 12:47AM by RadarKat73080

Connect
RSS Feed for palin.topictastic.com Site Feed
©2010 palin.topictastic.com

Powered By
Powered By TopicTastic.com